Return
to SLFK 211 Home Page
|
|
|
|
SLFK 211 October 1, 2002
Trickster material and the concerns of the child
Food you understand Acquisition of food disgust in children takes a long time Katherine on opposite end of doggy chew Kid at our house and cat snacky crackies Then white food stage How do you tell what makes food edible? Color? Ed School experiment on kids and taste Mr. Yuck stickers Successful written material makes use of folklore principles, like dealing with basic issues of childhood: Dr. Seuss and Green Eggs and Ham
What you can do to your own body What parts can you cut and when does cutting something cause injury Cutting hair, nails
Living and not living Figuring out that what you can do to a dolly is not something that you can do to baby brother, or pet You pick up pet by one paw the way you pick up dolly by one leg, you get scratched
Greg on dead squirrel: Mommy, what is that squirrel doing? It's dead; it's not doing anything Why? Probably a car hit it Which one? What color? Later: Mommy, it's dead; it's not doing anything
Factor of repetition and confirmation and tales Greg checks with Dad and confirms info gotten from Mom
Tales don't so much teach a child as parallel his process of discovery, speak in a child language Child's perception of reality is different from an adult's Greg and Mommy, I've holding it as tight as I can. Greg and my wee-wee isn't working &endash; Daddy hit it with a hammer
Narrative that parallels more effective than simple statement Telling kid about bear with ax in its side more effective than telling kid not to play with sharp objects Kid logic is different and often narrative Greg and twinkle/tinkle in Mommy's eye
Various general principles in this course One is the statement above &endash; that a story is more effective than a simple statement Depth of meaning Emotional component
Encoding is better These are animal tales for a reason &endash; distancing Kids' love of dinosaurs And general association of child and animal/pet And please note that this association is based EXACTLY on the distinctions I have been talking about Oral and anal behavior Aggression Association of animal and child shared by child and adult and/or lasts into adulthood Treating pet as babies Pets, esp. cats jealous of babies Affect pregnancy Pet as child's best friend Stuffed animals
You can't really speak to the kid in adult language until he is ready for it &endash; need language of tales, developed over a long period of time an through oral telling, watching the reaction of many kids Already told them round and round, nakey, nakey Kids discussing the toilet behavior in public &endash; I made yellow wee-wee all over everywhere: the chair, the floor, the carpet I have a hair Concepts like sharing before a kid is ready Later, kid can be quite concerned and caring Leaving lamb for other people Bee stung Mommy's knee
Because the distinctions kid is dealing with are SO basic, any violation of them tends to be violent As with kid and pet Wrong food &endash; Greg and magnet This is exactly what it is in stories, only more so &endash; artistic (and more effective) version of child experience
Kids do not see the violence &endash; focus on the distinction Greg and Peter and the PBS stories about owls feeding their babies, snakes eating animals whole
This is exactly the point &endash; adults hear the stories and think they are awful Kids encounter the same material and think it is great, often funny
Simpsons and Itchy and Scratchy Please note that goody, goody Lisa laughs, too
Show The Trades
Then Nu Pogodi
Then Wiley Coyote and Road Runner
Adult reaction to these &endash; these things are awful Or, I think they are funny, but I really shouldn't So I should tell my kid that they are awful so that he or she does not become a destructive SOB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|