N.B. Figures will print fine using Internet Explorer, but take over the whole page using Netscape

Mammalian Genetics, lecture 3

Expression of cloned genes in mammalian cells

  • Transfection or gene transfer is routine
  • transient transfections
    • no integration into genome
    • no selection needed
    • 1-3 days
  • stable transfections
    • requires selection
    • integration into genome
    • random site(s)
    • may get rearrangements
    • low frequency

More transfection…

  • viral infection
    • high frequency
  • electroporation
    • transient or stable
    • most cell types can be electroporated
    • high cell death
    • requires ample DNA

Requirements for transgene expression

  • Removal of plasmid sequences
    • poison
  • Promoter
  • Intron
  • polyA+ signal
  • Enhancer
 

Enhancer elements increase the probability of expression, but not the level

Transgenic mice

Transgenic mice, flowchart

Mouse embryology

oviduct, preimplantation development --->

from Hogan, B., R. Beddington, F. Costantini and E. Lacy 1994. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo; A Laboratory Manual. 497 pages.


Ovulation, fertilization

Inverted microscope for microinjections

DIC optics, egg injection

Oviduct transfer

Microinjection

Transgenic approaches, landmark findings

Human MyoD distal enhancer confers muscle-specific expression

Testing Sno promoter elements

Sno promoter-lacZ transgenic, E13.5

Gene expression in the a and b-globin gene clusters is controlled by common locus control regions

Testing gene function

  • selective expression of novel or altered genes can be used to perturb complex systems
    • information about
      • development
      • functions
      • malfunctions
  • e.g. SRY gene into transgenic mice
    • showed that SRY was the testis-determining gene
    • SRY transgene could convert female into phenotypically male mice

    Ski transgenic mouse (lower left) and non-transgenic littermate (upper right) (Sutrave and Hughes)

    this showed that Ski modulated skeletal muscle development and maturation

     

    BAC transgenesis to correct mutation

    YAC transgenesis to create mouse with human antibody repertoire

    Another example of testing gene function

    Measurement of the Size of the CAG Expansion in the R6 Transgenic Lines

    HD expansion transgenic mice

    Comparison of R6 Transgenic Mice and Littermate Controls

    Regulatory regions of genes can be mapped in transgenic mice

    More transgenic approaches

    And more…

    Inducible transgenes

    Tet systems

    Tet-on system

    Lac repressor

     
    Figure 1.   Schematic representation of lacI transgenes (A) and target transgenes (B). (A) The lacI transgenes. All constructs are driven by a 4.3-kb fragment of the human -actin promoter (shown in white; only the 3' region of the promoter is represented), containing an intron indicated by the splice donor (d) and acceptor (a) sites. For each construct, the coding region for the lac repressor is derived from segments of the wtlacI (W, shown in yellow) and synlacI (S, shown in blue) coding regions as indicated. The first four chimeras were made by exchanging the linker between the promoter and coding region, and/or the 5' part of the coding region (5'C1-4) between W and S. The next four chimeras were made by exchanging 3' segments of the coding region (3'C1-4). In the last two constructs, M (W coding region) and R (3'C4 coding region), the coding region is flanked by segments of the rabbit -globin locus (shown in red). (alt. a, potential alternative splice acceptor sites present in the lacI coding region; E and P, EcoRV and PvuII restriction enzyme sites; arrows indicate position of primers used for the PCR shown in Fig. 2). (B) The lac operator containing target transgenes. (1) SVOZ. The SV40 early promoter containing a single, symmetric lac operator drives expression of the -galactosidase (lacZ) reporter gene, which contains the endogenous Oz operator. (2) The regulatable Tyrosinase transgene (TyrlacO). Three lac operators have been introduced into the murine tyrosinase promoter. The primary operator was centered just downstream of the start of transcription by changing the endogenous promoter sequence; two additional operators were inserted 176 bp and 526 bp upstream. The modified promoter drives expression of the wt murine tyrosinase cDNA.
    Figure 6.   IPTG controls LacIR repression of the TyrlacO target gene in the mouse. Mice (A), dissected eyes (B), and cross-sections through eyes (C). Note that the nontransgenic albino and the TyrlacO, LacIR double transgenic lack pigmentation, whereas the Tyrosinase transgenic and the TyrlacO, LacIR double transgenic that has been treated with IPTG are pigmented. (ONL, outer nuclear layer; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; Scale bar represents 25 µm in C).
    Figure 7.   Control of the TyrlacO target gene is reversible during embryogenesis and after birth. (A) Photomicrographs of embryonic eyes at E12.5. As shown in the far right panel, IPTG can cross the placenta and induce pigmentation in the TyrlacO, LacIR double transgenic RPE, just as in the adult shown in Figure 6. (EC, eye-cup edge; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; L, lens).
    (B) Photographs of P3 mice. The corresponding appearance of the eyes at birth is shown for each genotype. The mother of the double-transgenic animal shown in the panel on the far right was started on IPTG at E12.5. The eye pigmentation seen at birth shows that even after the transgene has been silenced by the lac repressor (as demonstrated by the albino phenotype of the TyrlacO, LacIR double-transgenic E12.5 eye in panel A), it can be derepressed by IPTG. (C) Tyrosinase can be silenced after a period of derepression. Left and right panels show the same TyrlacO, LacIR double transgenic animal. On the left as an infant (P8) and on the right as an adult. IPTG was discontinued at P9, causing reversion to an albino phenotype in the adult.

     

    Targeting transgenes to a specific site

    Transgenic approaches, mutagenesis

    Summary of approaches for isolating new genes and mutations

    Gene traps

    Gene trapping, Gene trap embryos

    In vitro efficiency of exon-insertion versus splice-acceptor traps
    from Voss…Gruss, Dev. Dynamics 212:171 (1998)

    Gene trap construct n X 10e7 cells electroporated #G418-resistant colonies #betaGal+ colonies (%)
    Splice acceptor, total 30 501 231 (46)*
    pGT1.8geo 25 453 191 (42)**
    pKC199Bgeo 5 48 40 (83)***
    Exon-insertion, total 10 161 18 (11)****
    pGT1.8geo-no intron 2 22 1 (5)
    pEIT2 3 67 6 (9)
    pEIT3 5 72 11 (15)

    Basic Gene Trap vectors

    Figure 1  The basic trap vectors. 
    Enhancer-, gene- and promoter-trap vectors, which all contain a lacZ reporter gene and a NEOMYCIN RESISTANCE GENE (neo) that is driven by an autonomous promoter, are shown trapping an endogenous gene 'X'. Integration of the trap vectors into the embryonic stem (ES)-cell genome will lead to neomycin selection whether the insertion has occurred intergenically or intragenically. a | The p3LSN enhancer-trap vector25 contains a truncated heat-shock inducible minimum (hsp68) promoter immediately upstream of lacZ. Insertion of the enhancer-trap vector close to the enhancer of gene X will lead to the transcription and translation of the lacZ reporter when the enhancer of gene X is activated. This vector usually generates hypomorphic rather than null mutations. b | The pGT4.5 gene-trap vector contains a splice acceptor (SA) site immediately upstream of a promoterless lacZ gene. Its integration in an intron leads to a fusion transcript being generated from the upstream exon of gene X and lacZ upon transcriptional activation of gene X. c | The p-gal promoter-trap vector needs to be inserted into the coding sequence of gene X to activate transcription of lacZ. On activation of gene X, a fusion transcript and protein between the upstream gene X sequence and lacZ will be generated. (Adapted from Ref. 103, with permission.) (-gal, -galactosidase; -geo, -galactosidase–NeoR fusion; HSV-tk, herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase; h-actin, human -actin; pA, polyadenylation; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase 1.)

    From Nature Reviews Genetics 2:756 (2001)

    Figure 2 |  A comparison of beta-gal, beta-geo and polyA gene-trap vectors. 


    Each vector is shown inserting into intron 1 of gene X. a | The -gal vector contains a splice acceptor (SA) site immediately upstream of the lacZ reporter gene followed by a neomycin resistance (neo) selectable marker that is driven by an autologous promoter (PGK). All insertions, regardless of whether the insertion occurs in an intron (as shown) or in intergenic regions, lead to neomycin resistance and selection. If the insertion occurs in an intron, a fusion transcript is generated between the lacZ reporter and the upstream exon of gene X on transcriptional activation of the locus. b | The insertion of the -geo vector generates a fusion transcript and protein from the -geo reporter gene and the upstream exon of gene X, providing that gene X is transcriptionally active in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells. c | In this polyA-trap insertion, a fusion transcript and protein are generated from lacZ and the first exon of gene X; however, the polyA-trap also leads to a fusion transcript between neo and the downstream exons of gene X, providing a polyA site with which to stabilize the neo transcript. Several stop codons that follow neo prevent the 3' exons of gene X from being translated. The -gal and polyA-trap vectors will trap genes that are not transcriptionally active when trapping is carried out. The advantage of the polyA-trap vector over the -gal vector is that neomycin selection should only occur when the polyA-trap vector inserts upstream of a splice acceptor and a polyA site of an endogenous gene, thereby eliminating selection of intergenic insertions. (-gal, -galactosidase; -geo, -galactosidase–NeoR fusion; pA, polyadenylation; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase 1; SD, splice donor.)

    From Nature Reviews Genetics 2:756 (2001)

    From Nature Reviews Genetics 2:756 (2001)

    Multiple ways to abolish or reduce function of a gene product

    Continued…

    Continued…

    Continued…

    Continued…

    Dominant negative

    Embryonic stem (ES) cells

    Derivation of stem cells

    Mosaics and chimeras

    Mutagenesis using transgenes

    Knockout or gene targeting

    Gene Targeting flowchart

    Knock-in strategy reveals the complete expression pattern in time and space of the gene, whereas transgenes carrying even 4.8 kb may not recapitulate the entire expression pattern.